6/14/10- BP Exec admits clean-up technology is dated

5/29/10 - Top Kill Fails

5/22/10 - NOAA's Oil Trajectory Update

5/22/10 - NOAA's Web Update

5/20/10 - EPA: BP Must use less toxic dispersant

WASHINGTON – Today, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued a directive requiring BP to identify and use a less toxic and more effective dispersant from the list of EPA authorized dispersants. Dispersants are a chemical used to break up oil into small droplets so that they are more easily degraded.

The directive requires BP to identify a less toxic alternative – to be used both on the surface and under the water at the source of the oil leak – within 24 hours and to begin using the less toxic dispersant within 72 hours of submitting the alternative. 

If BP is unable to identify available alternative dispersant products, BP must provide the Coast Guard and EPA with a detailed description of the alternative dispersants investigated, and the reason they believe those products did not meet the required standards. 

EPA’s directive to BP can be found here: http://www.epa.gov/bpspill/dispersants.html

While the dispersant BP has been using is on the agency’s approved list, BP is using this dispersant in unprecedented volumes and, last week, began using it underwater at the source of the leak – a procedure that has never been tried before. Because of its use in unprecedented volumes and because much is unknown about the underwater use of dispersants, EPA wants to ensure BP is using the least toxic product authorized for use. We reserve the right to discontinue the use of this dispersant method if any negative impacts on the environment outweigh the benefits.

On May 15, EPA and the U.S. Coast Guard authorized BP to use dispersants underwater at the source of the Deepwater Horizon leak. As the dispersant is used underwater, BP is required to do constant, scientifically rigorous monitoring so EPA scientists may determine the dispersant’s effectiveness and impact on the environment, water and air quality, and human health. EPA is posting the information BP collects during the monitoring to ensure the public has access to this data.

5/18/10 - Statement of Lisa P. Jackson

Administrator, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Testimony on Federal Response to the Recent Oil Spill in the Gulf of Mexico

Senate Committee on Environment & Public Works

WASHINGTON - Chairman Boxer, Ranking Member Inhofe, and members of the Committee, thank you for inviting me to testify about EPA’s role in responding to the BP Deepwater Horizon rig explosion. As we all know, efforts by BP to stop the oil release continue. While there is no perfect solution to the environmental disaster that the Gulf of Mexico is facing right now, EPA is committed to protecting our communities, the natural environment and human health. That commitment covers both the risks from the spill itself, as well as any concerns resulting from the response to the spill.

Let me begin by recognizing the extraordinary effort put in by our responders. These are people that have maintained their resolve in the face of often overwhelming challenges. They have gone above and beyond and we certainly owe them a debt of gratitude. In the last three weeks, EPA has dispatched more than 120 staff scientists, engineers, and contractors to Alabama, Florida, Louisiana, and Mississippi to perform rigorous testing and monitoring of air and water quality. We are tracking any possible adverse impacts stemming from controlled burning of surface oil, possible chemicals rising from the oil itself, and any issues caused by the use of dispersants. We are working with State officials, with local University scientists, and other Federal agencies to get the best available data, share that data in a timely fashion, and to ensure proper response for the Gulf Coast people and their environment.

At the president's direction I have personally traveled to the region – the region I grew up in and still consider home – twice over the past weeks, to personally oversee EPA's efforts and to meet with the local community to ensure their questions and concerns are addressed.

For weeks, EPA responders have been monitoring air pollutants including, particulate matter, hydrogen sulfide, and total volatile organic compounds – or VOCs – from the oil in the Gulf, as well as the controlled burning of oil. These pollutants could pose a health risk to local communities and this monitoring is essential to ensure that communities are protected as BP takes direct response actions. EPA is also monitoring water quality by conducting surface water testing along the Gulf Coast, both in areas that have been impacted and those not yet affected. All of this information is being made public as quickly as we can compile it. We have been posting regular updates to our webpage http://www.epa.gov/bpspill, which has been a critical resource since the beginning of this event.

A primary concern is to ensure the safe application of chemical dispersants. Oil spill dispersants are chemicals applied to the spilled oil to break down the oil into small drops below on the surface. The dispersed oil mixes into the water column and is rapidly diluted. Bacteria and other microscopic organisms then act to degrade the oil within the droplets. However, in the use of dispersants we are faced with environmental trade-offs. We know that surface use of dispersants decreases the environmental risks to shorelines and organisms at the surface. And we know that dispersants breakdown over weeks rather than remaining for several years as untreated oil might. But, we are also deeply concerned about the things we don’t know. The long term effects on aquatic life are still unknown and we must make sure that the dispersants that are used are as non-toxic as possible. We are working with manufacturers, with BP and with others, to get less toxic dispersants to the response site as quickly as possible.

EPA has previously authorized use of several dispersing chemicals under the National Contingency Plan. In order to be placed on this list, each dispersing chemical must undergo a toxicity and effectiveness test. On Friday, EPA and the On Scene Coordinator authorized the application of dispersant underwater, at the source of the leak. The goal of this novel approach is to break up and degrade the oil before it reaches the water’s surface, and comes closer to our shorelines, our estuaries and our nurseries. Based on our testing, this can be done by using less dispersant than is necessary on the surface. But let me be clear that EPA reserves the right to halt the usage of sub-surface dispersant if we conclude that at any time; the impact to the environment outweighs the benefit of dispersing oil. As with our other monitoring initiatives, EPA and the Coast Guard have instituted a publicly available monitoring plan for sub-surface dispersant application to understand the impacts to the environment. This data will come to EPA once a day and if the levels in the samples are elevated, EPA will re-consider the authorization of use of dispersants.

EPA is also preparing to support any necessary shoreline assessment and cleanup. This could include identifying and prioritizing sensitive resources and recommending cleanup methods. EPA, in coordination with the States, will continue to provide information to both workers and the public about test results, as well as assisting communities with potential debris disposal and hazardous waste issues.

Madam Chairman, as a New Orleans native, I know first hand the importance of the natural environment to the economy, to the health and to the culture of the Gulf Coast. As I mentioned, since the accident, I have been to the region twice. I have listened to people in numerous town halls from Venice, LA, to Waveland, MS and other communities in between. I’ve learned in those meetings that the people of the Gulf Coast are eager to be part of this response. They want to be informed and – where possible – empowered to improve their situation on their own. We have a great deal of rebuilding to do, both in material terms and in terms of restoring this community’s trust that government can and will protect them in a time of need. This is one of those times. I urge that we do everything within our power to ensure a strong recovery and future for the Gulf Coast.

EPA will continue to fully support to the U.S. Coast Guard and play a robust role in monitoring and responding to potential public health and environmental concerns. As local communities assess the impact on their economies, EPA, in partnership with other federal, state, and local agencies, will provide all assets to assist in the recovery. At this time I welcome any questions you may have.

5/17/10 - Insertion tube draining 1,000 barrels per day

5/16/10 - Riser Insertion Tube Tool was successfully tested and inserted into the leaking riser

5/11/10 - NOAA Dispatches Northeast Science Chief to Lead Rapid Responce Contaminatin Testing System

5/11/10 - NASA Pictures of the Oil Slick from Space

5/7/10 - Fishing Closures Continue to grow

5/6/2010 - Deepwater Horizon Spill -  Crude Oil Behavior

5/04/2010

BREAKING NEWS: KATRINA COURT RULING FAVORS MARTZELL & BICKFORD CLIENTS. WE WILL BE UPDATING OUR WEBSITE WITH FURTHER INFORMATION ON THE COURT'S GROUNDBREAKING RULING SHORTLY. IN THE MEANTIME, YOU CAN VIEW THE FULL TEXT OF THE COURT RULING HERE.

Have you suffered damage from Chinese Drywall? Because of a shortage of American made dry wall after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita, tons of Chinese Drywall was used in repairing damaged homes in this area. Some of the Chinese Drywall can damage your electrical system, plumbing system, appliances, or other systems in your home. Chinese Drywall can possibly cause damages to your health.

The first sign you may have a drywall problem is the presence of a strong odor - often described as the smell of rotten eggs. People have had to move out of their homes because of the smell, and air conditioning coils, which are supposed to last a decade or more, are failing in homes only a couple of years old. Pipes and wiring may also be deteriorating because of the Chinese drywall fumes.

If your house smells like rotten eggs or the smell created when you first strike a match, if the copper in your home has black scaling, or if you have damage to your electrical system, plumbing system, appliances, or other systems, you may have a claim against the suppliers of Chinese Drywall.

Please call the New Orleans law firm of Martzell & Bickford to determine if you have a claim. 1-800-432-4427
If you have been effected by Chinese Drywall, click here to fill out an Intake form and one of our attorneys will contact you. READ MORE